Tafa Balogun, Lucky Igbinedion, Cecilia Ibru etc were some of the
top-notch personalities that graced the prison of the EFCC albeit, some
spent their prison terms in lush hospitals, while some were just
persuaded to let go of bit of their loots as was the case with
Igbinedion, former Edo state governor who paid a meager 3million naira
as plea bargain, having been convicted of embezzling over 10billion
naira of public funds.
Now, Nuhu Ribadu is no more in the saddle at the EFCC, what is
happening with the fight against corruption? Ms Farida Waziri came into
the setup of the anti-graft agency in 2007 she practically did little or
nothing. She merely struggled to re-enact the zeal and tenaciousness
that was akin with the Ribadu led EFCC. Was that the beginning of the
downfall of the EFCC? Now we have on board a certain man called Ibrahim
Lamorde, who came out recently to complain of lack of funds. Was that
the reason for the seemingly death of the EFCC? What happened to all the
money recovered as loots from corrupt elements? Agreed, Ribadu and
Obasanjo were selective in their fight against corruption. What are we
going to term Ibrahim Lamorde and President Jonathan?
Seriously, I think the EFCC under the stewardship of Lamorde is
merely reporting to Office and not fighting corruption. Or else, when
was the last time the EFCC prosecute even a fly? Let alone having high
profile politicians in their nest. At a point the EFCC claimed immunity
of some corrupt governors is serving as stumbling block against their
prosecution. But governors that left office in 2007 and 2011 don’t have
immunity, or do they? The newly elected governor of Ekiti state, Ayodele
Fayose was impeached in 2006 and with the several allegations against
him, what was the EFCC doing since his fall from power? We learnt the
corruption case against him has been dropped because of his new status
as governor-elect. Does a governor elect have immunity? He does not
become governor until October, so what is the EFCC still doing? Until
the following postulations are strictly adhered to, the EFCC would
remain in the cooler.
BUDGETARY ALLOCATION
It is a fact that the EFCC does not have it own budgetary
allocations. They are tied to the apron strings of the presidency,
little wonder it consistently lacks proper funding. It was reported last
year that the anti-graft body had less than 100,000 in their coffers.
Do you fight corruption like that?
INDEPENDENT AGENCY
The current state of the EFCC where the President decides who to
prosecute should cease. If you are in the good book of the President,
you get shielded when, the reverse is the case, it is hounding and witch
hunting becomes the order of the day. The EFCC should function as a
separate and independent agency from the Presidency.
CHAIRMANSHIP
The chairman should not be a lackey or stooge of the President. He
or she should be a man of proven integrity and a thorough breed in the
act of crime fighting. He should be independently appointed by a
constituted authority in the mould of the National Judicial Commission
(NJC).
No comments:
Post a Comment